|
Multifamily Management
and Strategy
April 2005
Click to
download a .pdf version of this article to print.
Why
Rent.com Sold for $415 Million in Cash
eBay’s purchase of
Rent.com for $415 million should trigger a
moment of pause for all apartment professionals. The ability of CEO Scott
Ingraham, President Allan Hunter and their whole team to build an online
apartment marketing company and sell it in four years to the market leader is a
tremendous coup, and we congratulate them.
But we also think the deal should cause apartment executives to
consider why Rent.com is worth as much as a portfolio of 5,000 apartment units.
The answer is simple: Rent.com does a better job tracking marketing results than
most apartment firms. They exploit this weakness in apartment marketing and
monetize it by taking the risk of closing the deal alongside their customers. If
that is worth $415 million to eBay, multifamily CEOs should start asking how
they can better track their marketing results, and how they can improve their
marketing strategies to yield a greater NOI. To many, marketing seems
unmanageable, but it doesn’t have to be. This issue of Multifamily Management
and Strategy examines how firms can get more leads for less money and
dramatically improve how they handle those leads.

Buying the Cheapest Prospect Leads First
When I was in college, I threw parties that required a lot of
beer. To slake the thirsts of most party-goers, I bought in-expensive beer by
the keg. If I wanted something special for my roommates, I bought a foreign beer
in fancy bottles after the main buying was done. I didn’t buy a lot of expensive
beer first and then fill in with cheap stuff. We were 19 and the point was to
have a good time, not to provide for the expensive lifestyle of strangers.
While this seems an obvious strategy, most apartment companies
fail to apply it to their marketing. Instead, they often buy the most expensive
ads first and fill in with the cheap ones. That’s a costly mistake. If you know
the number of units coming vacant in your portfolio this year as well as your
lead conversion rate and your walk-in traffic, you can estimate how many leads
you need to buy to fill those vacancies. Once you understand that you are buying
leads in bulk (albeit market-by-market and property-by-property), it is easy to
figure out how to buy them—buy all of the cheapest leads first, and if you need
more than the cheap guys can provide, fill in with leads from other sources.
According to Kevin Thompson, its Senior Director of Marketing,
AvalonBay Communities is on
track to reduce their marketing costs by at least 10% for the third year in a
row using this strategy of buying the highest quality leads from lowest cost
sources.



Every property has a certain amount of “organic” drive-by traffic. That’s the
advertising that comes from having a building on a busy street. The rest is
purchased. The data we have seen says that Internet leads from
RentNet.com and
Apartments.com are the lowest cost leads, or the lowest cost-per-lease,
depending on how you want to count. Referrals from existing residents cost more,
and leads from print sources still more than that. Locator services top the
pyramid as the highest cost-per-lease, but presumably with the highest level of
value too.
According to the National Association of Realtors, at least
70% of home searches start on the Internet. While compa-nies need to consider
the relative performance of ad publishers in their markets, their basic plan
should be: (1) count the leads you need; (2) buy all you can at the lowest
price; and (3) and fill in with the more expensive leads as needed.
But that is not clear to most senior managers, which partially
explains why Rent.com fetched so much money—they add a lot of value and
certainty for companies that are not sure their advertising works. Rent.com does
the tracking for their customers and takes the risk that their product works.
Advertising doesn’t have to be just a creative enclave that’s not accountable
for what it costs. Unfortunately, most firms do not begin their marketing
strategy by determining how many leads they need, which causes them to overspend
for advertising. If they did, they could make their advertising work as a cost
efficient operation that consistently delivers sufficient renter traffic at the
lowest possible cost.
Continue on page 2
>>>>
|